Table of Contents
Microservices is one of those software architecture trends that has not only changed the enterprise IT landscape, but has also ushered in an era of digital transformation. Microservices vs. monolithic architecture is an interesting debate considering that successful organizations like Netflix, Google, Amazon, and others are adopting these approaches to their software development. What are the advantages of microservices over monolithic architecture?
Microservices architecture vs. monolithic architecture
Let us begin with a comparison between microservices and monolithic architecture.
- Monolithic applications are traditionally built as a single unit. Enterprise Applications are built in three tiers: a database, a client-side user interface, and a server-side application. The server-side application will handle HTTP requests, execute business logic, retrieve and update data from the database, and output an HTML view for the browser. Since it works as a single logical executable unit, it becomes difficult to make alterations or updates to the system. In the case of monolithic architecture, the developers must build and deploy an updated version of the server-side application.
- Microservices are developed as individual modules and the core implementation of the service is completely veiled. These APIs are used in a way that gives consumers the freedom to modify the systems of record or service compositions that may lie underneath the interface.
Software development processes with microservices vs. monolithic architecture
Software development such as waterfall, agile, etc. usually results in large teams working on a single monolithic deployment artifact. Generally, there isn’t an issue with these kinds of development cycles, however, there are some drawbacks which tend to occur during the development of monolithic products:
- Monolithic applications tend to be so large that sometimes the bigger picture is lost by individual developers.
- Limited reuse can occur across monolithic applications.
- Scaling monolithic applications can be a challenge.
- Traditionally single development stacks are used for Monolithic applications, which can limit the choice of development tools.
Microservice architecture in tandem with cloud deployment technologies, API management, and integration technologies paves the way to new approaches in software development. In this case, the monolith is disassembled into a set of independent services that are developed, deployed and maintained separately. Microservice architecture has the following advantages:
- Services are developed in a modular fashion, ideally by a small team of developers working on each service.Services are developed in a modular fashion, ideally by a small team of developers working on each service.
- Services exist as independent deployed entities that can be scaled independently of other services.
- If microservices’ interfaces are exposed with a standard protocol, such as a REST-ful API, they can be consumed and reused by other services and applications without direct coupling through language bindings or shared libraries.
- All this freedom of developing services discretely allows developers to use their choice of the development framework.
However, there are certain trade-offs – with flexibility comes complexity. Managing a complex number of distributed services at scale is difficult for the following reasons:
- Proper documentation for each service must be made available so that project teams can easily discover services as potential reusable components.
- Interdependency between services needs to be closely monitored. Downtime of services can potentially break multiple systems.
Benefits of microservices vs. monolithic architecture
The business benefits of microservices architecture over monolithic architecture are quite significant. This significance can be realized and measured in the form of technical debt. In monolithic applications, segregated components share the same memory, taking away some of the flexibility that should be available in an agile development process. Monolithic codebases are more time consuming to work with and more expensive to maintain which in turn increases technical debt.
However, microservices architecture reduces technical debt and brings other benefits to the business which can reduce costs and impact the bottom line:
- Agility: Microservices speed up development and allow DevOps to focus on updating relevant pieces of an application. In turn, this is great for agile teams looking to accomplish tasks in shorter timeframes.
- Efficiency: Microservices architecture is known to offer significant cost savings to the tune of 50%, by reducing the need for computing infrastructure required to run a given application as compared to monolithic architecture.
- Resiliency: Since multiple services are handling multiple tasks, susceptibility to a single point of failure is minimized. Maintenance becomes a lot easier, and scalability is a lot more viable.
- Revenue: Faster updates, decreased downtime definitely affect the bottom line and lead to an increase in revenue. User retention and engagement will improve if a microservices-based application is constantly enhanced.
Stay ahead of the game with our helpful resources
4 digital solutions to address common application performance issues
High network latency, memory leaks, slow page loads, heavy CPU usage, and unresponsive servers are all typical performance issues we’ve experienced at some point when using or accessing digital applications. With how easy they occur in projects across verticals, you might be wondering whether the development teams behind these programs have done enough due diligence prior to the release. But human errors and oversight aren’t always the culprit. The reality is that while developers can strive to develop a fully functioning program with virtually no apparent faults upon delivery, no software is truly error-free. Even the most rigorously tested applications
6 useful tips for creating more robust application lifecycle management
As digital technology becomes the norm, software acquisition is now key to gaining a competitive edge in today’s market. Be it as a value offering tailored to consumers or a productivity tool to run complex processes, custom software undeniably helps companies drive growth and deliver value more efficiently. Just as necessary as having a proprietary application is prescribing a standard procedure to govern and maintain its utility. This is to ensure that your business can develop or adopt the right type of software—one that can fully cater to your business needs while keeping disruption to a minimum across critical milestones.
5 major roadblocks businesses must overcome when transitioning into a new software environment
As the business landscape becomes increasingly saturated, staying ahead of the curve often means embracing disruptive technologies to meet the fickle market demands. In most cases, this entails knowing when to pivot your current strategy to an entirely new solution. But recognizing the importance of digital shift is one thing; implementing the necessary IT upgrade is another. A global survey by Deloitte has found that although 87% of companies manage to identify the impact of digital trends on their industries, only 44% have adequately prepared for the coming disruptions. This vast disconnect between organizational expectations and conditions in the field
Is cloud computing the answer to better software development?
Cloud computing is perhaps not a term often heard in daily conversations, but it is one with a far-reaching impact on our technological needs. From expansive options of online data storage to numerous suites of web-based productivity tools like Google Workspace, nearly everyone has used a cloud-enabled technology. Over the last decade, this high degree of versatility also underpins the rapid cloud uptake among businesses. In fact, one survey has found that 94% of companies have already shifted their computing workloads on cloud platforms to varying extents. Unsurprisingly, the market size for cloud technology continues to grow exponentially. With a